May. 13, 2024
Micro inverters are one of the 2 solutions that address the issues we have mentioned with String Inverters. If you have shading on your roof, then you may consider micro inverters as an option. Rather than using a string inverter, micro inverters are smaller individual inverters placed directly onto each panel.
If you want to learn more, please visit our website Safe single phase string inverter.
This means that each panel is a separate energy module and will not impact any of the other panels. If one panel in an array of 20 panels is shaded and only producing at 50% capacity, this won’t impact the energy production of any other panels in an array. This means the entire system can still produce 97.5% of the capacity.
Another positive, is that the energy production by each individual panel can be accurately tracked, usually from a mobile phone app or web-based page. This means you can easily identify any underperforming panels and use that to find solutions. Micro inverters are also marginally safer than string inverters because they convert the DC energy into AC power at the module level and there are no high DC voltages present.
The major downside of micro inverters is the price - which is quite a bit higher when compared to string inverters. The maintenance costs can also be higher because you now have potentially 20 individual inverters that can fail.
Power Optimisers are a bit like a hybrid between string inverters and micro-inverters. Similar to micro-inverters, a power Optimiser is a small attachment to the back of every panel. Power Optimisers enable the maximum energy harvest from individual panels, like a Micro inverter, and can be monitored on an individual panel level.
Similar to a micro-inverter, Power Optimisers are also very safe, because the power will be isolated at the panel during failures. While Power Optimisers are more expensive than a simple string inverter system, they cost less than micro inverters - and combine the benefits of both.
As such, we recommend Power Optimisers where shading or a complicated roof design would negatively impact the performance of your Solar System. However, if you are lucky enough to have an uncomplicated, unshaded roof, then a string inverter by itself is still a great option.
Good luck with your solar plans! If you have any questions or would like a quote for your property that you can trust, get in contact with our team of solar specialists.
by
If you asked me what type of inverter your rooftop solar system should use:
I would say…
“Go with whichever you like. Unless there are special circumstances it makes little difference. Don’t stress out if salespeople try to convince you one is significantly better than the other.”
I do have evidence to back up this advice. It’s not like my wig — something I just pulled out of my hat:
But if you think Finns and Australians are a little flaky and you’re only interested in advice from properly cheese-appreciating nations, then today is your lucky day. A kind commenter recently referred me to a French study that says the overall output of the two types are essentially equal.
The paper is called:
“Performance ratio of photovoltaic installations in France: Comparison between inverters and micro-inverters”
You can read the whole thing here or, if you prefer, just read my summary since I’m going to condense it like milk, just giving you all the sweet details you need to know.
But before I do that, I will let you know the authors have some strange ideas about string inverters. They don’t think they’re reliable, so they recommend microinverters even though they found their performance to be the same. This makes me think the authors are all French croissants and so deliciously flaky. In my experience, string inverters last longer than the 8-12 year figure they give.
Or at least they last a lot longer if you buy one that isn’t merde.
But I assume you’re smart enough to check out our Solar 101 Guide and use a brand on our recommended chart that’s likely to last for well over 10 years:
The study examined the performance of 200 solar systems1. The study authors evenly split the solar systems between string inverters and microinverters:
100 String Inverter Systems: These were all SMA inverters either:
100 Microinverter Systems: These were all Enphase microinverters of four types:
SMA is Europe’s most common string inverter, with 40% of string inverters in the database. Microinverters in Europe — and pretty much everywhere else — are nearly all Enphase.
The average age of the string inverters was 7.6 years, while it was 2.8 years for the microinverters. This difference is not good because solar panels very slowly deteriorate in output over time. This is likely under 0.5% a year for decent quality panels.
Because the microinverter systems average 4.8 years younger, it gives them an unfair advantage when comparing their output.
If French rooftop solar systems deteriorate at an average rate of 0.4% per year, the 4.8 year average age difference would reduce the output of string inverters by 2%.
Related links:For more High-Voltage Lithium Battery Pack for USAinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.
The study doesn’t attempt to adjust for the age difference but merely states:
“As the data with inverters is over a longer period than for micro-inverters, the Performance Ratio can even be considered to be slightly lower for micro-inverters.”
The 100 string inverters consisted of:
This made the average string inverter capacity 4.75 kilowatts. This is higher than the average inverter size for their database, which was only a little over 3 kilowatts. This low average size is important because string inverters tend to become slightly more efficient as they increase in size, while the efficiency of microinverters remains the same no matter what size the solar system using them is.
With the average residential inverter size now around 7 kilowatts in Australia, ours will have slightly better average efficiency than the French sample.
Enphase is by far the largest manufacturer of microinverters and were the only type in the study. Their numbers and types were:
The solar systems were located in metropolitan France. This is the main part of France between Spain and five other European countries with an inadequate appreciation for mimes.
To compare string inverter systems with microinverter systems, they determined the Performance Ratio for each solar system by comparing its actual output to its maximum theoretical output if there were no losses. To determine the theoretical maximum for a solar system, they took into account:
When they divided the actual output of the solar systems by their theoretical maximum, they got an average of 79% for both string inverter and microinverter systems. This was contrary to the authors’ “initial intuition”, which was the latter would perform better.
Despite finding no difference between the systems compared and saying the performance ratio for microinverters should be considered a little lower if age is taken into account, the study recommends using them. The reasons they favour microinverters are where I think the paper gets a little strange.
The study says microinverters are cheaper overall. The graph below from the paper shows that — in France — string inverters are cheaper than microinverters if more than five panels are installed. The mostly straight, blue line represents their cost. The dotted grey line represents the cost of string inverters:
But they say a string inverter will have to be replaced twice in its lifetime while microinverters won’t. I don’t know what kind of antifreeze they’ve been putting in their wine, but this idea is nuttier than gateau aux noix.
The paper assumes string inverters only last 8-12 years, while microinverters last 25-30. According to the authors, a string type will have to be replaced twice to last as long as microinverters.
If any of the authors are reading this, I want them to listen very carefully…
String inverters and microinverters are the same damn thing. One is just bigger than the other. If a microinverter can last 25-30 years there is no reason why a string inverter of similar quality can’t last as long. It should actually last longer because string types are normally placed where temperature extremes are less than under a solar panel.
The authors make a big deal that Enphase microinverters can have a 25 year warranty, but this depends on location. In Australia, it’s only 10 years, as this table from the Enphase Australian/New Zealand warranty document shows:
I think it’s likely the authors have arrived at a misunderstanding of how long string inverters are likely to last stemming from two main factors:
Microinverters go on the roof under solar panels and so are a lot harder to replace than string inverters. They require a ladder, safety precautions for working at heights, solar panel removal, and so on. Because of this expense, if they didn’t have a long warranty no trustworthy installer would want to use them. It’s also not enough to just give them a long warranty; they have to be genuinely reliable otherwise the cost of replacing them will drive the manufacturer and/or installers broke.
Reliable electronics cost more than crap electronics, so microinverters aren’t cheap. But provided you are willing to pay for a quality string inverter, there’s no reason they can’t last as long as the 25 years Enphase microinverters are warranted in Europe and the USA. We know good quality string inverters can last for decades because many have. For example, I have a friend whose solar system was installed in 2003 and its original SMA is still operating without problem after 19 years.
One of the odd things about solar inverters is good quality low-cost ones, such as Solis and Goodwe, come with 10-year warranties; but more expensive European made inverters such as Fronius and SMA only come with 5 years of full warranty2, despite being regarded as very reliable.
The reason why they have shorter warranties than lower cost inverters appears to be so their manufacturers can sell extended warranties. These are popular in Europe and some Australians pay for them too. But note they are less valuable here because we’re protected by Consumer Guarantees that can apply after the written warranty has ended — especially if you paid a premium price for a product.
String inverters and microinverters have their own individual advantages and disadvantages, but if you are just looking to get solar installed on a typical roof, there’s not a lot of difference between them.
Microinverters aren’t cheap, but if you decide to go with Enphase — by far the most common type in Australia — you should be getting a reliable product that’s unlikely to fail for decades. But note, there is — quite literally — no guarantee it will last for decades in Australia.
If you instead get a system with a low cost but reliable string inverter, you can expect the inverter to last for well over a decade. If you pay for a high-quality unit, you can also expect it to last for decades. As with microinverters in Australia, there is no guarantee it will last for decades, but it’s easier to replace if it does fail.
You don’t need to worry about which will give you the best output. My experience matches the French study that says they’re much the same. So don’t be too worried about which is best for your home. Just go with whichever you prefer.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter!
Your email
Are you interested in learning more about Efficient three phase string inverter? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!
Previous: Unveiling the Power of Camel Milk in Kuantan: Benefits and Where to Buy
Next: All About Inverter Air Conditioners: Side-Discharge AC vs. ...
If you are interested in sending in a Guest Blogger Submission,welcome to write for us!
All Comments ( 0 )