How to Save Money When Buying Home Ozone Generator

You will get efficient and thoughtful service from Quanju.

You&#;re probably here because you&#;re in the market for an Ozone generator. Great! Before you click &#;Buy It Now&#;, let&#;s make sure you&#;re getting the most bang for your buck.

In true Jenesco, Inc. fashion, which is always full transparency, let us give you a quick rundown of things to consider before buying an Ozone generator.

What the Right Ozone Generator Can Do For You

Our ozone generators take oxygen from ambient air and add a third oxygen atom to the molecule. At this point, the molecule is a little unstable and ready to oxidize anything it comes into contact with. I realize unstable seems like a scary word, but in this case, it&#;s a good thing.

When that unstable molecule meets something toxic, beautiful things happen. Some things ozone generators can be used for include:

• Removing toxic and black mold
• Killing bed bugs
• Removing smoke and other strong odors
• Killing bacteria

An effective ozone generator should be well constructed, have a high ozone output, and a long life expectancy.

&#;Optimal Conditions&#; and Pure Oxygen Ratings

A quick Amazon search for &#;ozone generator&#; yields hundreds of results. They all sound great on paper. If you put the right spin on it, it&#;s easy to make even the least desirable thing sound good.

Unfortunately, that&#;s what many ozone generator sellers are doing. They put a spin on their ratings by withholding information. These padded ratings make their machine sound like it&#;s worth your money.

For more Home Ozone Generatorinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.

Related links:
4 Tips to Choose an Industrial Metal Crusher
How Kitchen Exhaust Ozone Generators Purify Your Air: Explained

Avoid getting a subpar ozone generator by looking for these red flags:

• Measurements based on &#;optimal conditions&#;
• Output measurement based on PURE OXYGEN
• Ozone ratings  with no explanation  at all
• Replacement ozone plates recommended at the time of purchase

These &#;too good to be true&#; machines may cost you less upfront, but you&#;re also getting less upfront. Here&#;s why:

• Ozone generators typically use oxygen in the air we breathe to make ozone. By using pure oxygen to promote their product, companies report an ozone output of up to 5 times higher than what you&#;ll actually get out of the machine.
• Ozone generators work best in low humidity. By using &#;optimal condition&#; output, companies are telling you what the output could be with zero humidity while using pure oxygen. You won&#;t be running your generator in these so-called &#;optimal conditions&#;, so you&#;ll never see this level of output.
• Low-cost manufacturing and materials lead to lower prices, but also lead to ozone generators with short life spans. You&#;ll be replacing the ozone plate in no time.

What&#;s this look like? Under &#;optimal conditions&#;, a company may tell you that their machine has an ozone output of 3,500 mgph. Under normal operating conditions, which is what you&#;ll be seeing, their machine has an output of just 700 mgph. Therefore you would need 5 machines to get the ratings they are touting.

Make sure the ozone outputs you see are for the conditions you will be using the generator in. Don&#;t base your buying decision on pure oxygen measurements if you&#;ll be running your ozone generator using plain old air.

Jenesco, Inc. Ozone Generators

Unlike the false claims, smoke and mirrors, and &#;optimal condition&#; measurements you see from other manufacturers and sellers, we tell you what you&#;ll really get out of our ozone generators.  With Jenesco ozone generators, you can be confident you&#;re getting the best because we:

• Give you realistic output measurements. All of the ratings you see for our machines are based on normal air as a source and 60% humidity. These ratings are a conservative estimate of ozone output. If we used the &#;spin&#; method of other companies, our bare-bones model, the FM-14, would have a rating of 20,000 mgph. The rating we advertise is the more realistic 4,000 mgph.
• Use quality materials. No cheap plastic here. We use stainless steel and powder-coated aluminum.
• Make maintenance easy and inexpensive. Our ozone plates are designed to slide out easily. You can wash them by hand or run them in the dishwasher. If you do have to replace them, the average cost is $10, not $90+.

Don&#;t fall for tricks and false advertising. Jenesco, Inc. provides no-nonsense ratings for all of our machines. What you see advertised on our website is what you&#;ll see when you use it at home.

kythri said:

rlitman: From your link, the initial picture you provided is not one of the three examples...

Click to expand...

And that's relevant how? As you saw by reading further down, I linked the image from their fourth example (because who wants to see materials that passed the test?). I merely quoted their text stating that the samples were exposed for the standard 72 hours. Nothing more, nothing less, and none of that has any bearing on the fact that the image I claimed was cracked from 72 hours of exposure was indeed cracked through 72 hours of exposure. Would you have been happier if I cut out the "Below are three" and merely quoted: "examples of these materials after the 72 hour period"? Neither phrasing is any less factual.

Keep in mind that the thousands of images you can easily find online about ozone cracking over long periods of time (wikipedia has some nice examples) are also due to environmental exposures measured in the low parts per BILLION (if they could even be at detectable levels). The exposures in an accelerated aging ozone testing chamber more closely replicate what one would see in an enclosed space cleaned by an ozone generator.

And again, those first three test samples were unaffected. Then again, neither the chamber, nor the metal testing fixture were affected by the ozone either. Many materials stand up to ozone just fine, but some begin to be adversely affected almost before your eyes.

And that's relevant how? As you saw by reading further down, I linked the image from their fourth example (because who wants to see materials that passed the test?). I merely quoted their text stating that the samples were exposed for the standard 72 hours. Nothing more, nothing less, and none of that has any bearing on the fact that the image I claimed was cracked from 72 hours of exposure was indeed cracked through 72 hours of exposure. Would you have been happier if I cut out the "Below are three" and merely quoted: "examples of these materials after the 72 hour period"? Neither phrasing is any less factual.Keep in mind that the thousands of images you can easily find online about ozone cracking over long periods of time (wikipedia has some nice examples) are also due to environmental exposures measured in the low parts per BILLION (if they could even be at detectable levels). The exposures in an accelerated aging ozone testing chamber more closely replicate what one would see in an enclosed space cleaned by an ozone generator.And again, those first three test samples were unaffected. Then again, neither the chamber, nor the metal testing fixture were affected by the ozone either. Many materials stand up to ozone just fine, but some begin to be adversely affected almost before your eyes.

Want more information on ozonator for car? Feel free to contact us.